CT-powered cell quality management solution, built by battery experts
Whether you’re a cell producer, a cell buyer, or both, our Battery package lets you experience the full scope of Glimpse’s end-to-end cell CT scanning solution deployed at your facility. Powering some of the largest gigafactories in the world.
Why choose X-ray CT scanning for battery quality control?
A dent in the can, a negative anode overhang, a tear in the tab, a buckled jellyroll...
Battery defects come in a variety of shapes and sizes and can reside in any part of the cell. In many instances, these defects are latent, which means that they are initially imperceptible to standard electrical characterization techniques. By generating a high-resolution map of the cell's internal structure, X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning makes it possible to create a comprehensive assessment of a battery’s manufacturing quality.
A common misconception is that CT scanning is too slow and expensive to be compatible with gigawatt-hour scale battery production and assembly environments. That’s where Glimpse comes in.
10 to 30x scan time reduction without sacrificing image quality
Speed up cell CT with our high-throughput scanning module and build a digital fingerprint of your cell quality.
Increase sampling rates to hundreds of cells per day and beyond, prevent defect escapes, shorten root causing from weeks to hours, and reduce physical tear downs.
We support all cell form factors: Pouch, prismatic, and cylindrical.
Control your cell quality with our full suite of inspection algorithms
Anode overhang, cathode width, core circularity, can denting, crimp height, and many more. Our team has developed a suite of generalized cell inspection algorithms by collecting millions of cross sections from the world's most diverse dataset of cell designs.
This section describes Glimpse's standard automated inspection algorithms. Our standard algorithms are mostly targeted at cylindrical cells, but we support inspection algorithms for all cell form factors and even samples other than battery cells. Glimpse can develop bespoke inspection algorithms upon request. Contact us to discuss further.
Core
Core shape
Core buckling
Core impingement
Can
Anode overhang
Cathode width & positions
Crimp
Core shape
What we track
Area & effective diameter
Defined by the area captured by the inner contour of the innermost cathode wrap and the diameter of the corresponding circle
Circularity, MCC
Defined by maximum inward deviation from a minimum circumscribed circle (MCC). This metric identifies flat spots in the core
Circularity, d_min/d_max
Defined by eccentricity (min diameter / max diameter, or d_min/d_max). This metric identifies oval-shaped cores
Concentricity
Defined by the distance from the center of the can to the center of the core. This metric measures the centeredness of the jellyroll within the can
Note that we have two different core circularity metrics:
d_min/d_max and MCC. These metrics are complementary and can identify different types of circularity issues (see details below). Neither metric will approach 100% since jellyrolls are actually spirals; for instance, the maximum MCC value we observe in practice is ~93%.
Area & Effective Diameter
Circularity, dₘᵢₙ/dₘₐₓ
Circularity, min circumscribed circle (MCC)
Concentricity
How/where it is measured
Cylindrical cells:
Measured in every radial cross section from top to bottom of the jellyroll
Why it matters
Area & effective diameter
Large core area increases core buckling risk. Core area also serves as an indicator of jellyroll swelling over life¹
Circularity, MCC
Poor core circularity increases core buckling risk. The MCC metric can identify flat spots in the core, which are often hotspots for buckling initiation ²ʼ³. For cells with core buckling, MCC also measures the extent of buckling
Circularity, d_min/d_max
Poor core circularity increases core buckling risk. The d_min/d_max metric can identify oval-shaped cores, which are less resistant to buckling than circular cores
Concentricity
Off-centered jellyrolls have a higher risk of experiencing failure in high-vibration environments⁴
Level 1: Marginal core buckling, defined by the presence of any negative curvature of the cathode wraps
Level 2: Core buckling, defined by the presence of significant negative curvature of the cathode wraps
We also report the number of buckled cathode wraps. This metric is a more granular measure of core buckling severity than our three-level classification.
These metrics are highly correlated but complementary:
For instance, a cell with 1 buckled wrap may be classified as Level 2, while a cell with 3 buckled wraps may be classified as Level 1.
These levels aren't an exact science; in practice, the boundaries between these levels are fuzzy. For instance, the above image with 8 buckled wraps could be considered to have 9 buckled wraps.
Level 0: No core buckling
Level 1: Marginal core buckling
Level 2: Core buckling
2 buckled wraps
5 buckled wraps
8 buckled wraps
How/where it is measured
Cylindrical cells:
Measured in every radial cross section from top to bottom of the jellyroll
Why it matters
Core buckling is an internal shorting risk via either localized lithium plating, separator puncture via the cathode, or both. Some references: ¹ ² ³ ⁴
Glimpse has also published some research on “core collapse”. ⁵ ⁶ ⁷
Core buckling is driven by many complex factors, including jellyroll geometry, electrode material properties, and cell chemistry. Note that the cycle life/capacity fade is often unaffected by core buckling since the fraction of the jellyroll that has collapsed can be quite small (keep in mind much more capacity is contained in wraps far from the core). Also note that the probability/timescales of core buckling causing a small (soft) short, and then that short developing into runaway, are highly variable.
Cathode tip damage indicates especially high stress at the cathode start point and thus a higher risk of internal shorting. See slides 19–21 of this presentation³, covering joint work between Glimpse and NASA, for more details.
Minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation of anode overhang within the whole jellyroll, the top of the jellyroll, and the bottom of the jellyroll
Anode overhang asymmetry (top/bottom)
Anode overhang violations (overhang < 0 mm). Note that you may want to use an overhang threshold >0 mm in practice, but we use a 0 mm threshold here for simplicity. IEEE Std 1725-2021¹, section 5.2.4, suggests a minimum overhang spec of 100 µm.
Minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation of cathode width
Minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation of cathode end positions at the top and bottom of the cell
How/where it is measured
Cylindrical cells: Measured within the jellyroll in every axial cross section
Why it matters
Cathode width can correlate to cell capacity and/or energy since the cathode serves as the lithium source in the cell
Cathode end positions close to the anode terminal can pose an internal shorting risk
Variation in cathode width and/or end position often indicates poor coating/winding control
Crimp
What we track
Minimum, maximum, and mean crimp height, measured a fixed distance (0.8 mm) from the crimp edge. Minimum, maximum, and mean crimp groove gap.
Crimp height
Crimp groove gap
How/where it is measured
Cylindrical cells:
Measured in the header region in every axial cross section
Note: The crimp groove gap measurement only applies to cells with a clearly defined narrow groove region. See the images below: the left image does not have a measurable groove gap, while the right image does.
No measurable groove gap
Measurable groove gap
Why it matters
The crimp height and crimp groove gap are indicators of crimp quality, which impacts cell mechanical integrity, sealing quality, and abuse tolerance
Wide variability within a cell may indicate crimp deformation
Wide variability across cells may indicate a poorly-controlled crimping process
Cases studies
Learn how our cell customers are using the Battery package.
Glimpse's co-founders spent a combined 30 years in the Li-ion battery industry. Whether they were working for cell producers or electric vehicle makers, every time they faced a cell quality challenge, they systematically turned to the same technology for answers: X-ray CT scanning.
The Glimpse Portal Battery package was built to turn CT scanning from a low-volume, costly lab instrument into the world’s most powerful battery quality management solution.
Resources
CT for Battery Cells
Learn from our team of battery quality experts what CT can and cannot reveal in your cells, and why.